1. 1. Is Judicial Review a power that should be exercised regularly or sparingly? Why?
I believe that judicial review is perfectly alright to be exercised regularly like with Separation of Powers.
2. 2. Is it the job of the High Court to apply the Constitution in light of the intent of the framers of the Constitution (strict construction) or should they interpret the Constitution in light of changes in society/technology (living Constitution)? Why?
They should probably interpret the Constitution in light of changes in society. Many many things have changed over time, and it would be silly and unreasonable the go by the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment